ARLT

The Association for Latin Teaching

respice prospice






Summer Schools index


1911 1912 1913 1919 1920

1921 1922 1923 1924 1925

1926 1927 1928 1929 1930

1931 1932 1933 1934 1935

1936 1937 1938 1939 1945

1946 1947 1948 1949 1950

1951 1952 1953 1954 1955

1956 1957 1958 1959 1960

1961 1962 1963 1964 1965

1966 1967 1968 1969 1970

1971 1972 1973 1974 1975

1976 1977 1978 1979 1980

1981 1982 1983 1984 1985

1986 1987 1988 1989 1990

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020







ARLT Summer School  1971



  held at Bishop Otter College, Chichester

  Directed by Miss D. Charlesworth

THE 48TH SUMMER SCHOOL, CHICHESTER


          Bishop Otter College, Chichester was the scene of the 48th Summer School.  Despite difficulties due, mainly to the postal strike, the good attendance of both old faithfuls, and young initiates was a tribute to the influence of the A.R.L.T.’s work and the reputation of its conferences over the years.  The members are deeply indebted to the hard work of the imperturbable Miss Allott, the Gravetts (a splendid team!) and Miss Dorothy Charlesworth who directed with her never-failing grace and concern for the welfare of all.  Thanks are also due to those who arranged the permanent displays of text-books, archaeological aids, and models, and to Mr. Teague for some very necessary audio-visual equipment!

         To one whose first Summer School this was, the programme was a full one, in which the balance was rightly tilted towards activity.  Both the morning class of girls and their audience soon warmed to Nicholas Dunn’s genial personality and teaching on the Direct Method.  The prose classes were a major attraction, developing at times into a battle between Gods and Giants, in which, needless to say, the Gods (Boyd and Melluish) won - unfairly, of course!

          A tour of the “circuli” revealed groups working on Medieval texts (fascinating) and Junior Latin, and arguing with lively interest on new subjects such as C.S.E. And Comprehension.  A measure of the interest aroused by these discussion groups and the reading classes was the frequent complaint that we could not attend two at the one time.  The reading classes are part of the traditional “hard core” of the School, but, after some doubts on the matter, the writer is firmly convinced of their value.  The strictures of Mr. Dale and others have made him begin to read Latin with the accuracy and feeling which he had neglected hitherto.

          Sensitivity to the meaning of what we read was the keynote of both Mr. Richards’ Cicero classes and Mrs. Dennis’s sessions on “Aestimanda”.  We may have disagreed, but we could not fail to absorb the method.  Under their guidance literary criticism was both possible and exciting.  Dramatisation of texts with Junior Forms was the subject of Miss Schaeffer’s seminars - quite one of the most refreshing things at the conference.

          The rules of a lecture are somewhat different, but while there is less room for discussion lecturers can choose to stimulate by omission or satisfy by completeness.  In the event we were to sample both types.  Mr. Wilkie, in his talk on “Model-making”, was content to leave his audience with the desire to learn more of this absorbing classroom activity, whereas Mr. Griffin told us all we wanted to know in a progress report on the Cambridge Project, which is now beginning to face competition from north of the border.  Mrs. Parker spoke both as examiner and experienced teacher on the Metropolitan Board’s syllabus for Classical Studies.  In a most able lecture she dealt with the aims of the course and the presentation of the subject-matter; through preparation, the use of visual aids, and the approach from contemporary life.  Lectures in the nature of personal testimonies on their favourite authors were given by Professors Austin and Dudley.  Their eloquent wisdom and good humour made it agreeable to learn and difficult to disagree.

          It is futile to say that A.R.L.T. must welcome the discussion of topics such as non-linguistic Classics.  It has already done so and, if the feelings of the conference is anything to go by, will continue to do so in future.

          The lighter side of things, the social activities and the excursions, were equally enjoyable.  We remember the country dancing (organised by everyone who took part in it!), the shopping trips, the Latin Debate (the Common Market proving an unexpected source of humour), the entertainment, and the official excursions, which included some of the most exciting Roman sites in Britain.  The highlight was undoubtedly the visit to the palace at Fishbourne, so well displayed under the roof of its new tourist pavilion.  To mingle with the crowds there was to experience the feeling that Classics, as they say, had “arrived”.  Chichester 1971 had given us the last of its memorable experiences.

W.S.W.


(Perhaps there was an even later one - the entertaining evening as guests of the pipers’ guild.  Ed.)