1911 1912 1913 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
A Canadian at the ARLT Summer School
It would seem that a Canadian accent is not frequently heard at the Summer School
of the Association for the Reform of Latin Teaching. In view of the distance involved
this is understandable, and I am all the more grateful that the Ontario Department
(i.e. Ministry) of Education made possible my attendance at the Association’s forty-
This point of view is at present strongly influenced by the keen interest shown by
many of our teachers in new approaches to the teaching of Latin; and while the Direct
Method with which the A.R.L.T. Is closely connected, can scarcely be described as
new, it has, for a variety of reasons, received scant attention in Ontario, where
Latin has been taught almost exclusively by the grammar-
These developments should help to explain my particular interest in the demonstration
lessons in the Direct Method which began each day’s programme at the Summer School.
However, I shall limit my comments to an appreciation of the quality of the teaching
observed and to a few general observations regarding the method. For the gifted
teachers (cartoonists, pantomimists, tragi-
I must confess that, much as I was impressed by the demonstration lessons, I retain some doubts as to whether an oral method is indeed the most direct, and therefore the most efficient method of developing the special skills essential to the comprehension of a language that is now almost ivariably encountered in written form. Greater familiarity with the method may remove this doubt. In the meantime, my colleagues and I continue to study a number of novae viae, looking especially, though not exclusively for that method which may provide the straightest path to the comprehension and appreciation of Latin literature.
Not irrelevant at this point is the observation that most members of A.R.L.T. Concede the possibility of other roads to reformation. Evidence of this flexibility was given by the conclusion among the guest lecturers of Mr. D.J. Morton, Director of the Nuffield Research Project in Classics, whose explanation of the theory, aims, and techniques of the reading course being developed at Cambridge helped dispel some misconceptions as to its nature, if not to remove all reservations as to its probable efficacy as an alternative to Direct Method.
Indeed, I have not ceased to marvel at the richness and variety of the offerings
of the Summer School. After the demonstration lessons came the circuli, constantly
imposing upon the participant the necessity of choosing among six equally fascinating
and equally well-
Another feature of the week’s programme which amply reflected the reforming zeal of the A.R.L.T. was the emphasis placed upon correct Latin pronunciation and upon the rhythmic reading of Latin poetry. This part of the course was given an especially firm base by the presence throughout the week of Mr. Dale who has long been recognized as an authority on Latin and Greek pronunciation and whose oral reading of Latin has motivated many others to do likewise.
At this point, I shall venture the suggestion that some teachers might find a circulus in the appreciation of Latin poetry especially helpful. Such teachers may well be eager to assist their students at the senior levels to share the aesthetic pleasure which they themselves experience in reading Latin, but with the exception of a very few books such as Balme and Warman’s Aestimanda and Hornsby’s Reading Latin Poetry they find few practical suggestions as to the effective handling of such lessons. Need I say that I am definitely not thinking of formal lectures on literary appreciation, but rather of the kind of lesson in which the student is enables to discover for himself, or through group discussion, the special beauty and appeal of Latin poetry.
Evenings at St Hild’s brought a series of stimulating lectures beginning with Mr.
Andison’s witty and informative report of the teaching of Latin in Italy. Those
who planned the series ought especially to be congratulated upon the thoughtful integration
of the remaining lectures with the afternoon excusions. Mr.Garforth’s talk on Bede
prepared a suitable background and mood for the following day’s visit to Bede’s church
at Jarrow. Then an interesting juxtaposition of events brought us Mr. Bargrave-
I should not, however, be giving a true impression of the atmosphere of the Summer
School if I failed to recall something of its social as well as academic aspect -
May I conclude on a persoanl note by expressing my gratitude to those numerous members of the course and the teaching staff who went out of their way to make me “feel at home” and, if I may be excused for selecting two names out of that number, may I particularly thank the Secretary of the Association, Miss S.L. Wood, and the Director of the Summer School, Mr. M.J. O’Malley, who found amid their many duties and responsibilites the time and opportunity for several thoughtful courtesies that did not go unnoticed or unappreciated.
|Officers of ARLT|
|Read it Right|
|The Perse Plays|
|new classroom Latin|
|Classical Reading Group|
|Artefacts for the classroom|
|Latinum - online audio|
|2012 Moreton Hall|
|NC Latin grade descriptors|
|Common Entrance links|